/
Your selections:
The Viva in Doctoral Examination: A Habermasian Dialogic Occasion
- Houston, Gillian, Lovat, Terence, Lunt, Ingrid, Holbrook, Allyson, Dally, Kerry
Oral defence as a feedback mechanism in doctoral development and examination
- Lovat, Terence, Dally, Kerry, Holbrook, Allyson, Fairbairn, Hedy
Examiner feedback and Australian doctoral examination processes
- Dally, Kelly, Holbrook, Allyson, Lovat, Terence, Budd, Janene
Exploring doctoral examiner judgements through the lenses of Habermas and epistemic cognition
- Clement, Neville, Lovat, Terence, Holbrook, Allyson, Kiley, Margaret, Bourke, Sid, Paltridge, Brian, Starfield, Sue, Fairbairn, Hedy, McInerney, Dennis M.
Understanding the language of evaluation in examiners' reports on doctoral theses
- Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian, McMurtrie, Robert, Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Kiley, Margaret, Lovat, Terry
Consistency and inconsistency in PhD thesis examination
- Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Lovat, Terry, Fairbairn, Hedy
Are you sure you would like to clear your session, including search history and login status?