Showing items 1 - 9 of 9

Your selections:

Interpretation, confidence and application of the standardised terms: Identified, Probable, Possible, Exclude and Insufficient in forensic odontology identification

- Chiam, Sher-Lin, Higgins, Denice, Colyvas, Kim, Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane

Validity of forensic odontology identification by comparison of conventional dental radiographs: A scoping review

- Chiam, Sher-Lin, Page, Mark, Higgins, Denice, Taylor, Jane

Validation studies in forensic odontology – Part 1: Accuracy of radiographic matching

- Page, Mark, Lain, Russell, Kemp, Richard, Taylor, Jane

Expert interpretation of bitemark injuries: a contemporary qualitative study

- Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt

Context effects and observer: bias-implications for forensic odontology

- Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt

Reality bites: a ten-year retrospective analysis of bitemark casework in Australia

- Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt

Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I - a quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence

- Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt

Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II - judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability

- Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt

Uniqueness in the forensic identification sciences: fact or fiction?

- Page, Mark, Taylor, Jane, Blenkin, Matt

  • 1
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Deposit