A profile of education journals

- Fairbairn, Hedy, Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Preston, Greg, Cantwell, Robert, Scevak, Jill

All-male discussion forums for expectant fathers: evaluation of a model

- Friedewald, Mark, Fletcher, Richard, Fairbairn, Hedy

An oral component in PhD examination in Australia: Issues and considerations

- Kiley, Margaret, Holbrook, Allyson, Lovat, Terence, Fairbairn, Hedy, Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian

Consistency and inconsistency in PhD thesis examination

- Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Lovat, Terry, Fairbairn, Hedy

Evaluation and instruction in PhD examiners' reports: how grammatical choices construe examiner roles

- Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian, McMurtrie, Robert, Holbrook, Allyson, Lovat, Terry, Kiley, Margaret, Fairbairn, Hedy

Examiner comment on the literature review in Ph.D. theses

- Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Lovat, Terry

Examiner reference to theory in PhD theses

- Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy

Examining doctoral examination and the question of the Viva

- Lovat, Terence, Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Kiley, Margaret, Paltridge, Brian, Starfield, Sue

Exploring doctoral examiner judgements through the lenses of Habermas and epistemic cognition

- Clement, Neville, Lovat, Terence, Holbrook, Allyson, Kiley, Margaret, Bourke, Sid, Paltridge, Brian, Starfield, Sue, Fairbairn, Hedy, McInerney, Dennis M.

Linguistic diversity and doctoral assessment: Exploring examiner treatment of candidate language

- Holbrook, Allyson, Burke, Rachel, Fairbairn, Hedy

Oral defence as a feedback mechanism in doctoral development and examination

- Lovat, Terence, Dally, Kerry, Holbrook, Allyson, Fairbairn, Hedy

PhD thesis examination: overview report on an ARC Discovery Grant project 2003-06

- Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Lovat, Terence, Fairbairn, Hedy

Research ethics in the assessment of PhD theses: footprint or footnote?

- Holbrook, Allyson, Dally, Kerry, Avery, Carol, Lovat, Terry, Fairbairn, Hedy

Supervisor perspectives on the ‘end-stage’ of the doctoral examination process

- Dally, Kerry, Holbrook, Allyson, Lovat, Terence, Fairbairn, Hedy

The focus and substance of formative comment provided by PhD examiners

- Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Lovat, Terence

Understanding the language of evaluation in examiners' reports on doctoral theses

- Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian, McMurtrie, Robert, Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Kiley, Margaret, Lovat, Terry

Wellbeing and doctoral candidature: the background and development of the importance to doctoral wellbeing questionnaire

- Holbrook, Allyson, Shaw, Kylie, Fairbairn, Hedy, Scevak, Jill