- Title
- Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification
- Creator
- Brown, Scott D.; Marley, A. A. J.; Dodds, Pennie; Heathcote, Andrew
- Relation
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol. 16, Issue 3, p. 583-593
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.583
- Publisher
- Psychonomic Society
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2009
- Description
- Unidimensional absolute identification—identifying a presented stimulus from an ordered set—is a common component of everyday tasks. Laboratory investigations have mostly used equally spaced stimuli, and the theoretical debate has focused on the merits of purely relative versus purely absolute models. Absolute models incorporate substantial knowledge of the complete set of stimuli, whereas relative models allow only partial knowledge and assume that each stimulus is compared with recently observed stimuli. We test and refute a general prediction made by relative models, that accuracy is very low for some stimulus sequences when the stimuli are unequally spaced. We conclude that, although relative judgment processes may occur in absolute identification, a model must incorporate long-term referents to explain performance with unequally spaced stimuli. This implies that purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.
- Subject
- absolute identification; absolute models; relative models; unequally spaced stimuli
- Identifier
- uon:7184
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/806661
- Identifier
- ISSN:1069-9384
- Rights
- The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 960
- Visitors: 1507
- Downloads: 309
Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
View Details Download | SOURCE1 | Author final version | 514 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |