- Title
- Dry needling adds no benefit to the treatment of neck pain: A sham-controlled randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up
- Creator
- Gattie, Eric; Cleland, Joshua A.; Pandya, Jeevan; Snodgrass, Suzanne
- Relation
- Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Vol. 51, Issue 1, p. 37-45
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2021.9864
- Publisher
- Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2021
- Description
- Objective To examine the short- and long-term effectiveness of dry needling on disability, pain, and patient-perceived improvements in patients with mechanical neck pain when added to a multimodal treatment program that includes manual therapy and exercise. Design Randomized controlled trial. Methods Seventy-seven adults (mean ± SD age, 46.68 ± 14.18 years; 79% female) who were referred to physical therapy with acute, subacute, or chronic mechanical neck pain were randomly allocated to receive 7 multimodal treatment sessions over 4 weeks of (1) dry needling, manual therapy, and exercise (needling group); or (2) sham dry needling, manual therapy, and exercise (sham needling group). The primary outcome of disability (Neck Disability Index score) and secondary outcomes of pain (current and 24-hour average) and patient-perceived improvement were assessed at baseline and follow-ups of 4 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year by blinded assessors. Between-group differences were analyzed with a 2-way, repeated-measures analysis of variance. Global rating of change was analyzed with a Mann-Whitney U test. Results There were no group-by-time interactions for disability (Neck Disability Index: F2.37,177.47 = 0.42, P = .69), current pain (visual analog scale: F2.84,213.16 = 1.04, P = .37), or average pain over 24 hours (F2.64,198.02 = 0.01, P = .10). There were no between-group differences for global rating of change at any time point (P≥.65). Both groups improved over time for all variables (Neck Disability Index: F2.37,177.47 = 124.70, P<.001; current pain: F2.84,213.16 = 64.28, P<.001; and average pain over 24 hours: F2.64,198.02 = 76.69, P<.001). Conclusion There were no differences in outcomes between trigger point dry needling and sham dry needling when added to a multimodal treatment program for neck pain. Dry needling should not be part of a first-line approach to managing neck pain.
- Subject
- dry needling; exercise therapy; manual therapy; myofascial trigger point; physical therapy; sham treatment
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1476680
- Identifier
- uon:49844
- Identifier
- ISSN:0190-6011
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 455
- Visitors: 454
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|