- Title
- Systematic Review: Patient Perceptions of Monitoring Tools in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Creator
- Goodsall, Thomas M.; Noy, Richard; Nguyen, Tran M.; Costello, Samuel P.; Jairath, Vipul; Bryant, Robert V.
- Relation
- Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Vol. 4, Issue 2, p. e31-e41
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaa001
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2021
- Description
- Background and Aims: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a lifelong disease requiring frequent assessment to guide treatment and prevent flares or progression. Multiple tools are available for clinicians to monitor disease activity; however, there are a paucity of data to inform which monitoring tools are most acceptable to patients. The review aims to describe the available evidence for patient preference, satisfaction, tolerance and/or acceptability of the available monitoring tools in adults with IBD. Methods: Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central and Clinical Trials.gov were searched from January 1980 to April 2019 for all study types reporting on the perspectives of adults with confirmed IBD on monitoring tools, where two or more tools were compared. Outcome measures with summary and descriptive data were presented. Results: In 10 studies evaluating 1846 participants, monitoring tools included venipuncture, stool collection, gastrointestinal ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, wireless capsule endoscopy, barium follow-through and endoscopy. Outcome domains were patient satisfaction, acceptability of monitoring tool and patient preference. Noninvasive investigations were preferable to endoscopy in nine studies. When assessed, gastrointestinal ultrasound was consistently associated with greater acceptability and satisfaction compared with endoscopy or other imaging modalities. Conclusions: Adults with IBD preferred noninvasive investigations, in particular gastrointestinal ultrasound, as compared to endoscopy for monitoring disease activity. When assessing disease activity, patient perceptions should be considered in the selection of monitoring tools. Further research should address whether adpoting monitoring approaches considered more acceptable to patients results in greater satisfaction, adherence and ultimately more beneficial clinical outcomes.
- Subject
- acceptability; inflammatory bowel disease; monitoring tools; patient preference; tolerability
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1475931
- Identifier
- uon:49696
- Identifier
- ISSN:2515-2084
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1902
- Visitors: 1899
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|