- Title
- Examiner feedback and Australian doctoral examination processes
- Creator
- Dally, Kelly; Holbrook, Allyson; Lovat, Terence; Budd, Janene
- Relation
- ARC.DP180100448 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP180100448
- Relation
- Australian Universities' Review Vol. 61, Issue 2, p. 31-41
- Relation
- https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.224427
- Publisher
- National Tertiary Education Union
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2019
- Description
- Doctoral thesis examination is the litmus test for doctoral quality. Of those candidates who reach examination, most are notified they have more work to do on their thesis. Receiving and responding to feedback are integral parts of a formal learning process that continues until the final thesis is submitted. However, little is known about what happens after examiner reports are received by an institution, how recommendations and feedback are filtered through institutional processes to influence thesis outcomes, or about the roles that candidates and supervisors play in determining and giving action to thesis revisions. This article reports the findings from a desktop review of institutional protocols and policies governing doctoral thesis examination in Australian universities. Given that the PhD Viva, or oral examination, is rare in Australian universities, the authors question whether current examination processes allow adequate opportunities for candidates to actively engage with examiner feedback and take advantage of this final opportunity to demonstrate, or further develop, authoritative judgement and research autonomy.
- Subject
- doctoral examination; examination process; examiner report; response to feedback
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1462657
- Identifier
- uon:46521
- Identifier
- ISSN:0818-8068
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 861
- Visitors: 853
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|