- Title
- International comparison of guidelines for management of impetigo: a systematic review
- Creator
- Hall, Leanne M.; Gorges, Hilary J.; van Driel, Mieke; Magin, Parker; Francis, Nick; Heal, Clare F.
- Relation
- Family Practice Vol. 39, Issue 1, p. 150-158
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab066
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2022
- Description
- Background: Impetigo is a common superficial skin infection that affects people worldwide and is usually treated with antibiotics; therefore, its management has implications for global antibiotic stewardship. Objective: This systematic review and narrative synthesis compares and contrasts international impetigo management guidelines. Methods: Guidelines for treatment of impetigo that were produced by a national authority; available to primary care physicians; and published since 2008 were included. Following a comprehensive search strategy, data extraction from eligible studies was performed independently in duplicate. Details of antiseptic and antibiotic treatment; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment; and conservative management and preventative measures were tabulated and analysed descriptively. Results: Fifty-one guidelines were included from 42 different countries. All guidelines recommended systemic antibiotics, 78% of these only for widespread lesions or failure of topical antibiotic treatment. The first-line systemic antibiotic treatment was restricted to narrow-spectrum options in 21 (41%) whilst 7 (14%) recommended only broad-spectrum antibiotics first-line. Thirty-four (67%) guidelines included recommendations for topical antibiotic use. Twenty guidelines (39%) did not mention antiseptic treatment for impetigo. Guidelines did not always provide clear indications for different treatment options. Conclusions: Despite potentially equal efficacy to systemic antibiotics, only two-thirds of guidelines include topical antibiotic options. Many fail to include recommendations for non-antibiotic treatments such as antiseptics, preventative measures and conservative management, despite potential for antibiotic-sparing. Provision of clear definitions of disease severity and indications for treatment would enhance the ability of clinicians to adhere to recommendations. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018117770.
- Subject
- antibiotics; antimicrobial stewardship; antiseptics; guidelines; impetigo; management
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1453885
- Identifier
- uon:44762
- Identifier
- ISSN:1460-2229
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1260
- Visitors: 1260
- Downloads: 0