- Title
- Perineural invasion by prostate adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies predicts bone metastasis: Ten year data from the TROG 03.04 RADAR Trial
- Creator
- Delahunt, Brett; Murray, Judith D.; Steigler, Allison; Atkinson, Chris; Christie, David; Duchesne, Gillian; Egevad, Lars; Joseph, David; Matthews, John; Oldmeadow, Christopher; Samaratunga, Hemamali; Spry, Nigel A.; Srigley, John R.; Hondermarck, Hubert; Denham, James W.
- Relation
- Histopathology Vol. 77, Issue 2, p. 284-292
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14107
- Publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2020
- Description
- Aims: Perineural invasion (PNI) by prostatic adenocarcinoma is debated as a prognostic parameter. This study investigates the prognostic predictive value of PNI in a series of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation using 10 years outcome data from the TROG 03.04 RADAR trial. Methods: Diagnostic prostate biopsies from 976 patients were reviewed and the presence of PNI noted. Patients were followed for 10 years according to the trial protocol or until death. The primary endpoint for the study was time to bone metastasis. Secondary endpoints included time to soft tissue metastasis, transition to castration resistance, prostate cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. Results: PNI was detected in 449 cases (46%), with 234 cases (24%) having PNI in more than one core. The presence of PNI was significantly associated with higher ISUP grade, clinical T staging category, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group, and percent positive biopsy cores. The cumulative probability of bone metastases according to PNI status was significant over the 10 years follow-up interval of the study (log-rank test P < 0.0001). PNI was associated with all endpoints on univariable analysis. After adjusting for baseline clinicopathological and treatment factors, bone metastasis was the only endpoint in which PNI retained its prognostic significance (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.92, P = 0.021). Conclusions: The association between PNI and the development of bone metastases supports the inclusion of this parameter as a component of the routine histology report. Further this association suggests that evaluation of PNI may assist in selecting those patients who should be monitored more closely during follow-up.
- Subject
- ISUP grade; metastases; perineural invasion; prognosis; prostate adenocarcinoma; SDG 3; Sustainable Development Goals
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1443449
- Identifier
- uon:41992
- Identifier
- ISSN:0309-0167
- Rights
- This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Delahunt, Brett; Murray, Judith D.; Steigler, Allison; Atkinson, Chris; Christie, David; Duchesne, Gillian; Egevad, Lars; Joseph, David; Matthews, John; Oldmeadow, Christopher; Samaratunga, Hemamali; Spry, Nigel A.; Srigley, John R.; Hondermarck, Hubert; Denham, James W. “Perineural invasion by prostate adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies predicts bone metastasis: Ten year data from the TROG 03.04 RADAR Trial”. Histopathology Vol. 77, Issue 2, p. 284-292 (2020), which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14107. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1747
- Visitors: 1841
- Downloads: 97
Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Author final version | 856 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |