- Title
- Gender and judging at the International Criminal Court: lessons from 'feminist judgment projects'
- Creator
- Grey, Rosemary; McLoughlin, Kcasey; Chappell, Louise
- Relation
- Leiden Journal of International Law Vol. 34, Issue 1, p. 247-264
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0922156520000588
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2021
- Description
- To date, analyses of gender justice at the International Criminal Court (ICC) have focused primarily on critiques of, and shifts within, the Office of the Prosecutor. This article takes a different approach by focusing on the ICC’s judiciary. We being by arguing that state parties can and should do more than electing a balance of male and female judges – they can also ensure gender-sensitivity on the Bench by supporting candidates with expertise in gender analysis, and by backing judges who bring a feminist approach to their work once elected. Next, we explain the concept of the ‘feminist judgment-writing’ and suggest that this method offers a useful framework for embedding gender-sensitive judging at the ICC. To illustrate this argument, we highlight opportunities for ICC judges to engage in gender-sensitive judging in relation to interpreting the law, making findings of fact, and deciding procedural questions. The final section of the article discusses how best to institutionalize the practice of gender-sensitive judging at the ICC.
- Subject
- feminism; gender; International Criminal Court; international criminal law; judges
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1433271
- Identifier
- uon:39200
- Identifier
- ISSN:0922-1565
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1459
- Visitors: 1455
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|