- Title
- Bulk anatomical density based dose calculation for patient-specific quality assurance of MRI-only prostate radiotherapy
- Creator
- Choi, Jae Hyuk; Lee, Danny; O'Connor, Laura; Chalup, Stephan; Welsh, James S.; Dowling, Jason; Greer, Peter B.
- Relation
- NHMRC.1132471 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1132471
- Relation
- Frontiers in Oncology Vol. 9, no. 997
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00997
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2019
- Description
- Prostate cancer treatment planning can be performed usingmagnetic resonance imaging(MRI) only with sCT scans. However, sCT scans are computer generated from MRI and therefore robust, efficient, and accurate patient-specific quality assurance for dosimetric verification are required. Bulk anatomical density (BAD) maps can be generated based on anatomical contours derived from the MRI image. This study investigates and optimizes the BAD map approach for sCT quality assurance with a large patient CT and MRI dataset. 3D T2-weighted MRI and full density CT images of 54 patients were used to create BAD maps with different tissue class combinations. Mean Hounsfield units (HU) of Fat (F: below −30 HU), the entire Tissue [T: excluding bone (B)], and Muscle (M: excluding bone and fat) were derived from the CT scans. CT based BAD maps (BADBT,CT and BADBMF,CT) and a conventional bone and water bulk-density method (BADBW,CT) were compared to full CT calculations with bone assignments to 366 HU (measured) and 288 HU (obtained from literature). Optimal bulk densities of Tissue for BADBT,CT and Bone for BADBMF,CT were derived to provide zero mean isocenter dose agreement to the CT plan. Using the optimal densities, the dose agreement of BADBT,CT and BADBMF,CT to CT was redetermined. These maps were then created for the MRI dataset using auto-generated contours and dose calculations compared to CT. The average mean density of Bone, Fat, Muscle, and Tissue were 365.5 ± 62.2, −109.5 ± 12.9, 23.3 ± 9.7, and −46.3 ± 15.2 HU, respectively. Comparing to other bulk-density maps, BADBMF,CT maps provided the closest dose to CT. Calculated optimal mean densities of Tissue and Bone were −32.7 and 323.7 HU, respectively. The isocenter dose agreement of the optimal density assigned BADBT,CT and BADBMF,CT to full density CT were 0.10 ± 0.65% and 0.01 ± 0.45%, respectively. The isocenter dose agreement of MRI generated BADBT,MR and BADBMF,MR to full density CT were −0.15 ± 0.90% and −0.16 ± 0.65%, respectively. The BAD method with optimal bulk densities can provide accurate and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for dose calculations in MRI-only radiotherapy.
- Subject
- mri-only planning; synthetic; ct; bulk density; anatomical structure; quality assurance; dosimetric vertification
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1425307
- Identifier
- uon:38230
- Identifier
- ISSN:2234-943X
- Rights
- © 2019 Choi, Lee, O'Connor, Chalup, Welsh, Dowling and Greer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 2647
- Visitors: 2859
- Downloads: 215
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Publisher version (open access) | 1 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |