- Title
- Have we increased our efforts to identify strategies which encourage colorectal cancer screening in primary care patients? A review of research outputs over time
- Creator
- Dodd, Natalie; Mansfield, Elise; Carey, Mariko; Oldmeadow, Christopher; Sanson-Fisher, Rob
- Relation
- Funding BodyNHMRCGrant Number1073031 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1073031
- Relation
- Preventive Medicine Reports Vol. 11, Issue September, p. 100-104
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.05.015
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2018
- Description
- Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain suboptimal. Primary care practitioners are supported by clinical practice guidelines which recommend they provide routine CRC screening advice. Published research can provide evidence to improve CRC screening in primary care, however this is dependent on the type and quality of evidence being produced. This review aimed to provide a snapshot of trends in the type and design quality of research reporting CRC screening among primary care patients across three time points: 1993-1995, 2003-2005 and 2013-2015. Four databases were searched using MeSH headings and keywords. Publications in peer-reviewed journals which reported primary data on CRC screening uptake among primary care patients were eligible for inclusion. Studies meeting eligibility criteria were coded as observational or intervention. Intervention studies were further coded to indicate whether or not they met Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) study design criteria. A total of 102 publications were included. Of these, 65 reported intervention studies and 37 reported observational studies. The proportion of each study type did not change significantly over time. The majority of intervention studies met EPOC design criteria at each time point. The majority of research in this field has focused on testing strategies to increase CRC screening in primary care patients, as compared to research describing rates of CRC screening in this population. Further research is needed to determine which effective interventions are most likely to be adopted into primary care.
- Subject
- review; colorectal cancer; early detection of cancer; primary care; study design
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1390136
- Identifier
- uon:33003
- Identifier
- ISSN:2211-3355
- Rights
- © 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 2352
- Visitors: 2719
- Downloads: 389
Collections
Goal 3: Good Health and Well-Being
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Publisher version (open access) | 739 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |