- Title
- On conversational valence and the definition of interjections
- Creator
- Libert, Alan Reed
- Relation
- 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference. Proceedings of the 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference – 2011 (Canberra 01-04 December, 2011) p. 281-295
- Relation
- http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9418
- Publisher
- Australian Linguistic Society
- Resource Type
- conference paper
- Date
- 2012
- Description
- Interjections, like some other word classes, have proven difficult to define in a principled way, and therefore there has been disagreement about whether some words belong to this class. Lists of interjections in grammars sometimes include arguably disparate items, e.g. greeting terms, along with words such as oh and ah. There has also been dispute about the possibility or necessity for interjections to be in a syntactic relation to other components, that is, about their valence. In this paper I propose a definition of interjection which involves an extension of valence in the usual syntactic sense, introducing the notion of conversational valence to distinguish between interjections and words such as goodbye. The latter can only be felicitously used when there is an addressee present, as well as the speaker, thus having a conversational valence of 2, while interjections do not require an addressee, i.e. their conversational valence is 1. For example, if I stub my toe I can appropriately say ouch! in the absence of anyone else. Interjections are distinguished by being the only linguistic items with such a low conversational valence.
- Subject
- interjections; word classes; pragmatics; valence; greetings
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1328070
- Identifier
- uon:25815
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1184
- Visitors: 1481
- Downloads: 318
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Publisher version (open access) | 202 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |