- Title
- A systematic review of the quality of reporting in published smoking cessation trials for pregnant women: an explanation for the evidence-practice gap?
- Creator
- Bryant, Jamie; Passey, Megan E.; Hall, Alix E.; Sanson-Fisher, Rob W.
- Relation
- Implementation Science Vol. 9
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0094-z
- Publisher
- BioMed Central
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2014
- Description
- Background: To facilitate translation of evidence into clinical practice it is critical that clear, specific and detailed information about interventions is provided in publications to promote replication, appropriate aggregation in meta-analysis, and implementation. This study examined whether twenty elements of interventions deemed essential for such translational application were reported in sufficient detail in smoking cessation trials with pregnant women. Methods: Searches of electronic databases using MeSH terms and keywords identified peer-reviewed English language studies published between 2001 and 2012. Eligible studies reported a smoking cessation intervention targeted at pregnant women and met Cochrane’s Effective Practice and Organization of Care group study design criteria. Each intervention arm of eligible studies was assessed against the developed twenty criteria. Results: Thirty relevant studies reported the findings of 45 intervention arms. The mode of delivery of the intervention was reported in 100% of intervention arms. Other well reported criteria included reporting of the provider who delivered the intervention (96%), sample characteristics (80%) and the intervention setting (80%). Criteria not reported adequately included care provided to women who relapse (96% not reported), details about training given to providers (77% not reported) and the method of quit advice advised (76% not reported). No studies reported 100% of relevant criteria. Conclusions: Current standards of reporting of intervention content and implementation are sub-optimal. The use of smoking cessation specific checklists for reporting of trials, standard reporting using behaviour change taxonomies, and the publication of protocols as supplements should be considered as ways of improving the specificity of reporting.
- Subject
- systematic review; data reporting; research methodology; evidence practice gap; smoking cessation
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1053776
- Identifier
- uon:15664
- Identifier
- ISSN:1748-5908
- Rights
- This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1583
- Visitors: 2171
- Downloads: 346
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT01 | Publisher version (open access) | 261 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |