- Title
- Addressing the needs of caregivers of cancer patients in general practice: a complex intervention
- Creator
- Jiwa, Moyez; Mitchell, Geoffrey; Sibbritt, David; Girgis, Afaf; Burridge, Letitia
- Relation
- Quality in Primary Care Vol. 18, Issue 1, p. 9-16
- Relation
- http://tugwell.info/journals/J10_Quality_in_Primary_Care/issues
- Publisher
- Radcliffe Publishing
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2010
- Description
- Background: This study aimed to develop an innovation to assist general practitioners (GPs) in Australia to proactively address the needs of caregivers of people with cancer. Method: Six GPs were video recorded each consulting six actor-patients in their respective practices. All cases depicted caregivers of people with cancer. The patients were instructed to complete a Needs Assessment Tool for Caregivers (NAT-C), before the consultation. Actor-patients were instructed to present the NAT-C to three of the six GPs they consulted, selected at random. Two assessors independently reviewed each consultation performance using the Leicester Assessment Package (LAP). The practitioners and actor-patients focused on the value of the NAT-C and how it could be deployed to best effect in a subsequent ‘stimulated recall session’. Results: Thirty-four consultations were successfully recorded. The mean duration of consultations was 13 min. 47 sec. (range 6 min. 3 sec. to 22 min.51 sec.). GPs differed in core competencies as measured by the LAP (P<0.001), range 37–92%. However, they demonstrated no significant differences in performance (LAP scores) analysed by scenario (P = 0.99). The ‘generalised estimating equation’ (GEE) model identified an improved LAP score in consultations in which the NAT-C was used (average of 3.3 points; 95% CI: –3.99, 10.6), after controlling for the different GPs and scenarios, but this improvement was not statistically significant (P = 0.37). The participants felt that the NAT-C was beneficial and suggested how it could be further refined. Conclusions: If this innovation had been formally tested in a randomised trial without assessing its impact on the consultation there might have been significant difficulties with administering the intervention in practice.
- Subject
- cancer; caregivers; consultation; general practice; innovation
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/932154
- Identifier
- uon:11271
- Identifier
- ISSN:1479-1072
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 8946
- Visitors: 2831
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|