https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:13768 Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:23:06 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:14217 Wed 11 Apr 2018 13:16:59 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:14088 Wed 11 Apr 2018 12:16:58 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:27254 Wed 11 Apr 2018 11:55:43 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:36091 Wed 02 Mar 2022 14:27:33 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:13766 Sat 24 Mar 2018 10:40:42 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:17786 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:57:23 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:30134 N = 178) participating in a healthy lifestyles study comparing a telephone versus face-to-face delivered intervention. Therapeutic alliance was assessed using the Agnew Relationship Measure; primary outcomes were treatment retention and changes in symptoms and health behaviors. Contrary to expectations, early alliance did not predict treatment retention. However, elements of both client- and therapist-rated alliance predicted some clinical outcomes (e.g., higher confidence in the therapeutic alliance at session 1 predicted improvements in 12-month depression). Some modest interactions between early alliance and intervention condition were also identified (e.g., clients initially with lower self-perceived initiative, or higher therapist-perceived bonding benefited preferentially from the telephone-delivered intervention), highlighting the need to further examine the interplay between therapeutic alliance and treatment modality.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:39:12 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:26614 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:34:00 AEDT ]]>